Google Hates Ringtones

Without any prior notice a filter mechanism for ringtone keywords was introduced in Google AdWords. Ringtone ads now need to be authoized.

A while back Google changed their editorial guidelines and introduced special rules for the promotion of mobile content such as ringtones, mobile games and mobile applications. Prime targets of the new rules are promoters of subscription services. Under the new guidelines Google requires them to display the price and the billing interval prominently on the page where the user enters personal information (such as a phone number or an email address). In addition to that, the page needs to be equipped with a checkbox that the user has to activate.

After the introduction of these new guidelines some advertisers and affiliates got slapped. However, I think many of the bad apples haven’t been found yet. That’s why Google simply switched the burden of proof. It’s not the Google employees that need to scan their AdWords system for active phony offers. Now any Google ads and keywords promoting mobile content need to be reviewed and confirmed by Google to be running.

That’s sort of how they handle ads for pharmaceuticals. The difference is that pharmacies can submit an ID and they’re exempt. For mobile content advertisers every single keyword, ad and landing page has to be approved individually. I’m sure Google are working on an algorithm to automate this. But for now I would say it’s a manual process.

Google’s main concern is the user experience. Trust translates into traffic and yields AdWords revenue. It seems they prefer not to accept money from advertisers that run rip-off campaigns in order to secure the core of their business: trust.

Google is following a long-term strategy and can live without the ringtone industry very well. On the other hand, most mobile content advertisers are after short-term profit and depend highly on AdWords for instant traffic. I think we’re starting to see how Google is using its power to take down a whole industry.

Google Trends for Websites

Google published a new feature where you can compare the visitor trends for multiple websites:

Google Trends for Websites

The feature also suggests related websites and keywords. Very interesting, not only for search marketers. This is another indicator for me that Google’s search algorithm will put more and more emphasis on data from the Google Toolbar and less on on-site factors and incoming links.

Using Google To Find The Hot Trends

If you’re not familiar with Google Trends yet, you better check it out. This free tool shows you the search volume for a given set of keywords in a defined region. I’ve been using it for keyword research for quite some time already.

Affiliate marketers can use it to find hot trends, promising niches, but also diminishing markets. Let me show you some examples (all data for the United Kingdom):

“presents” and “gifts”:

It’s no surprise that people look for these terms in December.

Facebook vs. MySpace:

Facebook is extremely hot in the UK at the minute whereas MySpace is becoming old.

The fall of “ringtones”:

Mobile content is not nearly as popular as it used to be.

So if you’re thinking about a new project, do your research on Google Trends. I’m not saying that you can’t be successful in declining markets. However, if you want to create something really big, you need to create something that people are interested in.

New Google Analytics Code Explained

I’m super busy with client work so I don’t have time to blog at the moment. In the mean time I would like to recommend you a post by Timo Aden of Google. He is explaining the secrets of the new version of the Google Analytics code. The post itself is in German but if you read the code you should understand what he’s talking about. Go to Timo’s post about the new code.

Tradedoubler AdMatch vs. Google AdSense

Usability

Even though Tradedoubler has made a huge step in the right direction, AdSense is still better. For example, Tradedoubler forgot to translate some of the interface words into local languages. Here’s an example of a mixture of a German interface with English wordings:


1:0 in favor of AdSense

Flexibility

Tradedoubler AdMatch lets you do way more stuff than Google AdSense. I like the fact that Tradedoubler also employs the product databases of its affiliate programs. However, Tradedoubler’s inventory of advertisers is minimal compared to Google’s. So even though Tradedoubler offers more in terms of looks, Google offers you way more matching ads.
2:0 in favor of AdSense

Technical Performance

I’m not impressed by AdMatch’s performance. It takes longer to load than AdSense, especially when it needs to examine a URL for the first time. Also, on Internet Explorer 7.0 on my Vista machine, AdMatch fails to display the ads under certain conditions. I can see that text is moved down and space reserved by the ad, but I can just see a blank space. I could reproduce that error on another machine.
3:0 in favor of AdSense

Conclusion

AdMatch is buggy! And Tradedoubler doesn’t have enough ads to be able to provide a good match for all these content sites out there. AdMatch is worth a try for those who run Tradedoubler affiliate programs already. Don’t use it if you make most of your money from contextual advertising!

Google Ad Manager

Google is working on an ad-serving platform for the masses. The so-called Google Ad Manager, currently in private beta, is aimed at small and medium-sized companies, creating a counterpart to DoubleClick’s DART.

The service is going to be free. The underlying purpose of Google Ad Manager is the further spread of AdSense on publisher sites. Just like Google Analytics is supposed to help AdWords clients optimizing their campaigns, Ad Manager is supposed to help AdSense clients to deliver more ads and collect more information about your site.